QWERTY vs. Dvorak vs. Colemak: Which Keyboard Layout Reigns Supreme?
Publié par ISAAC ROSEN le
Keyboard Layouts: An Overview
- QWERTY
- QWERTZ
- AZERTY
- Colemak
- Dvorak
- Programmer Dvorak
- Workman
- Norman
- Bépo
- Arensito
- QWPR
- Asset
- MTGAP 2.0
- Klauser
- Capewell QWERF/Dvorak/Capewell
- Minimak
- Tarmak
- Carpalx QFMLWY/QGMLWB/QGMLWY/QWKRFY/QWYRFM/Q/TNWMLC
Keyboard layouts refer to the arrangement of keys on a keyboard. There are various keyboard layouts used in different regions or countries, and for different purposes. Here is an overview of some of the most common keyboard layouts:
- QWERTY: This is the most common keyboard layout in use in the English-speaking world. The name comes from the arrangement of the first six letters on the top left row of the keyboard.
- QWERTZ: This keyboard layout is used mainly in Central Europe and Germany. The name comes from the arrangement of the first six letters on the top left row of the keyboard, which are QWERTZ instead of QWERTY.
- AZERTY: This keyboard layout is used mainly in French-speaking countries. The name comes from the arrangement of the first six letters on the top left row of the keyboard, which are AZERTY instead of QWERTY.
- Colemak: This keyboard layout is designed to be a more efficient alternative to QWERTY, with keys rearranged to reduce finger movement and increase typing speed. It is gaining popularity among touch typists.
- Dvorak: Similar to Colemak, the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard is another keyboard layout designed to improve typing efficiency. It arranges the keys so that the most frequently used letters are in the home row, reducing the need to move your fingers as much.
- Programmer Dvorak: A variation of the Dvorak keyboard layout designed for programmers and other computer users, with keys rearranged for easier access to common programming symbols and operators.
- Workman: Another keyboard layout designed to be more efficient than QWERTY, with keys arranged based on the frequency of use and the comfort of hand movement.
- Norman: A keyboard layout designed to reduce the risk of carpal tunnel syndrome and other repetitive strain injuries, with keys arranged to minimize finger movement and keep the hands in a more natural position.
- Bépo: A French keyboard layout designed to be more efficient than AZERTY, with keys arranged based on the frequency of use in the French language.
- Arensito: Another alternative keyboard layout designed for better typing efficiency, with keys rearranged based on the frequency of use and ease of access.
- QWPR: A keyboard layout similar to QWERTY, but with the home row keys rearranged for more efficient typing.
- Asset: Another keyboard layout designed for better typing efficiency, with keys arranged based on the frequency of use and hand movement.
- MTGAP 2.0: A keyboard layout designed for programming and other technical work, with keys arranged for easy access to common programming symbols and operators.
- Klauser: Another keyboard layout designed to reduce the risk of carpal tunnel syndrome and other repetitive strain injuries, with keys arranged to minimize finger movement and keep the hands in a more natural position
- Capewell QWERF/Dvorak/Capewell: A series of keyboard layouts designed for better typing efficiency and reduced finger movement, with different arrangements of keys.
- Minimak: A series of keyboard layouts designed for better typing efficiency, with different numbers of keys and different key arrangements.
- Tarmak: A series of keyboard layouts designed to help users transition from QWERTY to a more efficient keyboard layout, with different stages of key rearrangement.
- Carpalx QFMLWY/QGMLWB/QGMLWY/QWKRFY/QWYRFM/Q/TNWMLC: A series of keyboard layouts designed to reduce the risk of carpal tunnel syndrome and other repetitive strain injuries, with keys arranged to minimize finger movement and keep the hands in a more natural position. Each layout has a different arrangement of keys based on various criteria, such as ease of use and comfort.
Overall, there are many keyboard layouts designed to improve typing efficiency and reduce the risk of repetitive strain injuries. Each layout has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the best one for you may depend on your typing style and preferences.
Comparing Keyboard Layouts: A Table of Countries, Advantages, Disadvantages, and Popularity
Are you looking for a more efficient or ergonomic keyboard layout? Check out our comparison table of popular keyboard layouts, including their use in different countries, advantages and disadvantages, and popularity among users.
Keyboard Layout | Countries/Public | Advantages | Disadvantages | Popularity |
---|---|---|---|---|
QWERTY | English-speaking countries | Widely used and familiar | Not as efficient as other layouts | Very high |
QWERTZ | Central Europe, Germany | Familiarity for German speakers | Not as efficient as other layouts | High |
AZERTY | French-speaking countries | Familiarity for French speakers | Not as efficient as other layouts | High |
Colemak | General use | More efficient than QWERTY | Requires relearning the keyboard | Low |
Dvorak | General use | More efficient than QWERTY | Requires relearning the keyboard | Low |
Programmer Dvorak | Programmers and technical users | Easier access to programming symbols and operators | Requires relearning the keyboard | Very low |
Workman | General use | More efficient than QWERTY | Less familiar than other layouts | Very low |
Norman | General use | Reduces the risk of repetitive strain injuries | Less familiar than other layouts | Very low |
Bépo | French-speaking countries | More efficient than AZERTY | Less familiar than other layouts | Very low |
Arensito | General use | More efficient than QWERTY | Less familiar than other layouts | Very low |
QWPR | General use | More efficient than QWERTY | Less familiar than other layouts | Very low |
Asset | General use | More efficient than QWERTY | Less familiar than other layouts | Very low |
MTGAP 2.0 | Programming and technical work | Easier access to programming symbols and operators | Less familiar than other layouts | Very low |
Klauser | General use | Reduces the risk of repetitive strain injuries | Less familiar than other layouts | Very low |
Capewell QWERF/Dvorak/Capewell | General use | More efficient than QWERTY | Less familiar than other layouts | Very low |
Minimak | General use | More efficient than QWERTY | Less familiar than other layouts | Very low |
Tarmak | General use | Helps transition to more efficient layouts | Less familiar than other layouts | Very low |
Carpalx QFMLWY / QGMLWB / QGMLWY / QWKRFY / QWYRFM / Q/TNWMLC | General use | Reduces the risk of repetitive strain injuries | Less familiar than other layouts | Very low |
As the table shows, some keyboard layouts are more popular than others, but popularity does not necessarily indicate efficiency or comfort. Each layout has its own set of advantages and disadvantages, and the best one for you may depend on your personal preferences and typing style.